<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The rumors</title>
	<link>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/</link>
	<description>China and Other things</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Online Journalism China: shortcomings in the earthquake relief effort going unnoticed in the scramble to present a front of national unity : Journalism.co.uk editors blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9790</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Journalism China: shortcomings in the earthquake relief effort going unnoticed in the scramble to present a front of national unity : Journalism.co.uk editors blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 08:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9790</guid>
		<description>[...] law has came to the fore after a number of false rumours surfaced in chatrooms and forums alleging that the authorities had somehow been warned that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] law has came to the fore after a number of false rumours surfaced in chatrooms and forums alleging that the authorities had somehow been warned that the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: revi</title>
		<link>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9270</link>
		<dc:creator>revi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9270</guid>
		<description>@Jim

Well Jim, if one is smart one should read what ANYBODY writes with a pinch of salt and instead look at an issue from varying perspectives, but most important of all, KNOW YOURSELF AND LEARN TO THINK FOR YOURSELF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim</p>
<p>Well Jim, if one is smart one should read what ANYBODY writes with a pinch of salt and instead look at an issue from varying perspectives, but most important of all, KNOW YOURSELF AND LEARN TO THINK FOR YOURSELF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RUMOURS CAUSE CHAOS</title>
		<link>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9252</link>
		<dc:creator>RUMOURS CAUSE CHAOS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9252</guid>
		<description>"Last night saw another mass exodus from the core of the city area as rumors flew about another "looming" seismic event. Cars lined any boulevard where the buildings were "out of reach" and people slept the night away in them, with makeshift canopies and tents hanging off the opened doors and trunks." 

Excerpt from well-established Chengdu forum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Last night saw another mass exodus from the core of the city area as rumors flew about another &#8220;looming&#8221; seismic event. Cars lined any boulevard where the buildings were &#8220;out of reach&#8221; and people slept the night away in them, with makeshift canopies and tents hanging off the opened doors and trunks.&#8221; </p>
<p>Excerpt from well-established Chengdu forum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9228</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 05:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9228</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;I think people should take what they print about China with a very big pinch of salt,

I agree. Just wondering: does this rule apply to the entire state-controlled media in China as well? Or only CNN and the Epoch Times?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;I think people should take what they print about China with a very big pinch of salt,</p>
<p>I agree. Just wondering: does this rule apply to the entire state-controlled media in China as well? Or only CNN and the Epoch Times?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revi</title>
		<link>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9153</link>
		<dc:creator>Revi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9153</guid>
		<description>Ahem...don't know if you guys know this, but Epoch Times is actually part of the Falun Gong organisation's money making/marketing/propaganda vehicle. I think people should take what they print about China with a very big pinch of salt, although recently they have been alot less obvious about it, but occasionally their sentiment and bias still comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem&#8230;don&#8217;t know if you guys know this, but Epoch Times is actually part of the Falun Gong organisation&#8217;s money making/marketing/propaganda vehicle. I think people should take what they print about China with a very big pinch of salt, although recently they have been alot less obvious about it, but occasionally their sentiment and bias still comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Opposite End of China  &#124;&#124;  Xinjiang &#38; Northwest China Blog   (中国的另一端   &#124;&#124;   新疆 &#38; 中国西北博客)</title>
		<link>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9144</link>
		<dc:creator>The Opposite End of China  &#124;&#124;  Xinjiang &#38; Northwest China Blog   (中国的另一端   &#124;&#124;   新疆 &#38; 中国西北博客)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 07:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9144</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Aim Your Fury at Topeka....&lt;/strong&gt;

As hope fades for trapped victims of the earthquake disaster in Sichuan, the initial stage of shock and awe is giving way to a feeling of mass helplessness. Entire cities......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Aim Your Fury at Topeka&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>As hope fades for trapped victims of the earthquake disaster in Sichuan, the initial stage of shock and awe is giving way to a feeling of mass helplessness. Entire cities&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ranc</title>
		<link>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9137</link>
		<dc:creator>ranc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 05:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9137</guid>
		<description>Also, the USGS has the following useful FAQs. 

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/faq.php?categoryID=6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, the USGS has the following useful FAQs. </p>
<p><a href="http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/faq.php?categoryID=6" rel="nofollow">http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/faq.php?categoryID=6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ranc</title>
		<link>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9136</link>
		<dc:creator>ranc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 05:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blackandwhitecat.org/2008/05/14/the-rumors/#comment-9136</guid>
		<description>With regard to the first rumor, it will be benefitial if more people know type I error (false positive) and type II error (false negative) in statistics/forcasting. NO forecasting is 100% accurate, and before making any forecasting, one has to weight the relagive likelihood and consequence of the two types of errors in making that forecasting. So it's likely that some people have forecasted the quake, but if the forecast is deemed by most other people to have significant chances of being a type II error, with that error having significant consequences, than it's fairly normal that the forecast (of certain individuals) not announced to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regard to the first rumor, it will be benefitial if more people know type I error (false positive) and type II error (false negative) in statistics/forcasting. NO forecasting is 100% accurate, and before making any forecasting, one has to weight the relagive likelihood and consequence of the two types of errors in making that forecasting. So it&#8217;s likely that some people have forecasted the quake, but if the forecast is deemed by most other people to have significant chances of being a type II error, with that error having significant consequences, than it&#8217;s fairly normal that the forecast (of certain individuals) not announced to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
