Skip to content

Coup surrealism: embassy turns into boat, threatens US warship

As the crow flies, Tegucigalpa is just over 50 miles from the sea. So Brazil’s ambassador may have wondered why Honduran troops had pointed sonic weapons at his building and (very loudly) informed him in English that he was approaching a US warship in international waters:

This is a test of the Long Range Acoustic Device, LRAD, from American Technology Corporation. The LRAD can be used to hail and… This is a test of… Unidentified small boat. You are approaching a United States warship operating in international waters. Request you establish communications, identify yourself and state your intentions.

Perhaps the coup regime thought the ambassador was a Somali pirate who had got lost. In addition to repelling pirates and harassing embassies, the LRAD has previously been used by the US military in Iraq and, more recently, by the Pittsburgh police.

lrad-tegucigalpa.JPG

POSTSCRIPT: The video above comes from two videos uploaded to Youtube (Video 1, Video 2). It was presumably filmed on, or shortly after, September 22. I shortened them slightly and uploaded them to Youku, since Youtube is still blocked in China. It didn’t work. Readers may remember that I originally believed that Youku would not approve my compilation The Umbrella Men of Tiananmen. I was wrong. While Chinese liberals thought it was tragically funny but deeply embarrassing, nationalists thought it was a splendid display of patriotism and ingenuity on the part of the Armed Police. Youku immediately approved it. This video about Honduras, however, was almost immediately rejected. The reason given was the distinctly uninformative “because of the relevant regulations.” So now it’s on Yahoo instead.

Ai Weiwei’s surgery in Munich

Ai Weiwei’s surgery in Munich apparently went smoothly - two holes drilled in his head on Tuesday (or Monday evening?) to remove 30 ml of fluid from his skull. He says the pressure in his head has gone and so has the pain.

ai-weiwei-in-munich.jpg

He’d been suffering from headaches since police burst into his hotel room in Chengdu at 3 a.m. on August 12 and punched him. They also kept him confined to the hotel that day to prevent him from going to the trial of Tan Zuoren.

See Danwei for more info.

Before Urumqi: the 2002 needle attacks in Tianjin and Beijing

There’s nothing new about the use of hypodermic needles to threaten and rob people. It happens all over the world. What is unusual is for an entire city like Urumqi to be gripped by fear, with hundreds of people claiming to have been stabbed, and rumors swirling about separatists deliberately spreading AIDS.

But this is not the first time panic over needle attacks has filled a city in China. In January 2002, shopping areas in Tianjin were deserted and people on the streets were in a state of constant vigilance. Everyone knew some version, or versions, of the rumor: that people with AIDS from Henan were taking revenge, either for being infected or for being abandoned by society. Then the rumors spread to Beijing. None of them were true.

Four people were arrested and convicted in Tianjin; three in Beijing. In Tianjin, two of the attackers had used syringes during a robbery. The others were completely unconnected and none of them had AIDS. In one of the Beijing cases, the man didn’t even use a syringe - he was just pricking people with an awl. It was never clear how this really started. All of the people convicted had heard the rumors and copied them.

The panic in Tianjin and Beijing in 2002 was remarkably similar to the situation now in Urumqi. While some people really had been threatened or pricked by needles, it seemed that many of those who flocked to the hospitals had not pricked by anyone. Their “attacks” were just a product of mass hysteria.

The difference between these cities is that Tianjin and Beijing were not already on a knife edge when the rumors began. Unlike Urumqi, no one was beaten to death and there were no protests demanding the resignation of city leaders.

Below, I’ve translated a Southern Weekly report from late January, 2002. It’s worth reading now because we are unlikely to see open reporting like this in Urumqi and because it highlights just how unreliable such rumors are. In one of the claims the paper investigated, people were able to give detailed descriptions about the pursuit and capture of a non-existent attacker. The “victim” did exist, but she had simply misinterpreted a previously unnoticed scratch on her hand.

The original Chinese, via Sina.com, is here. (See also: Snopes on various versions of this rumor around the world.)

Investigation into the “Tianjin AIDS needle-stabbing” incidents
Southern Weekly, January 24, 2002

Rumors that people are using AIDS-carrying syringes to prick city residents have created anxiety throughout Tianjin. Police in Tianjin have caught four suspects. Tianjin TV broadcast an expert’s explanation: the HIV virus dies a minute and a half after leaving the human body due to congealing of the blood and unless the HIV carrier draws the blood at the scene and immediately injects a large quantity into another person, it is extremely difficult to transmit the HIV virus with a needle.

Why were the rumors so ubiquitous? Because there was no authoritative mainstream voice. It is worth considering how to make use of emergency mechanisms when public security crises occur.

Tianjin’s “anxiety”

For the last two to three weeks, the streets of Tianjin have been unusually deserted and residents’ eyes are on the alert as they have never been before.

The pedestrian shopping streets of Binjiang Road and Heping Road have given the city’s busiest commercial district the name “Tianjin’s Wangfujing.” But the sprinkling of pedestrians make it seem that the name does not match reality. One person from Shandong who came to Tianjin on a business trip says, “If you just looked at the people walking in the streets, you wouldn’t believe this was a big city. It’s pretty much like the small county town back at home.”

The source of the widespread malaise in this huge city of nine million people is a rumor: that a group of people with AIDS from Henan have come to Tianjian and are taking revenge on society by randomly stabbing people with syringes loaded with HIV-infected blood in public places like shopping centers, supermarkets and on the street.

According to a local reporter, people say the rumor began on Christmas Eve when it’s said that a man was pricked in Binjiang Shopping Center. After New Year’s Day [Jan. 1], stories about needle-pricking spread further and further and the number of people pricked became greater and greater until the whole city was filled with anxiety.

Faced with the difficulty in judging whether the rumor was true or false, people chose to take an attitude of “better safe than sorry” and did their best to keep outside activities to a minimum. (Continued)

US invited Honduran coup regime to military drills

The United States has supposedly ended military cooperation with Honduras because of the June 28 coup. So why has it invited the coup regime to take part in military exercises that start today?

The US Southern Command invited the Armed Forces of the de facto government of Honduras to take part in the PANAMAX 2009 maneuvers, despite the fact that Washington had announced a month ago its intention to suspend all military cooperation with the Central American country.

The participation of Honduras, together with 21 other countries*, was recorded in a list distributed hours ago in the Panamanian capital by the US Department of Defense which will coordinate the military exercises between September 11 and 12.

The invitation to the de facto regime appears to contradict the official position of the White House which proclaims that it rejects the coup that deposed Manuel Zelaya and advocates the isolation of the coup regime.

The coup regime in Honduras says it will not accept the invitation.

According to the Mexican news agency Notimex, the exercises will take place in waters off Panama and the coast of Honduras.

So, which is it? Is the US cutting off military ties with Honduras or not? For the last ten weeks, the US response to the military removal of Zelaya has been contradictory, repeatedly referring to it a coup, but refusing to officially classify it as one. It has cut off some of its aid to Honduras, but always stopped short of doing anything that would convince the regime that it must reinstate the constitutional president. Instead, Micheletti and his allies have been allowed to believe they can simply wait it out.

This ambivalence existed even before the coup took place. The US embassy in Honduras knew about the plan to overthrow Zelaya and says it advised against it. But if it had been serious in its opposition it should have been able to prevent the coup by threatening decisive action. It clearly didn’t do that.

Then there was the strange landing at the joint US-Honduran air base, Palmerola, of the plane carrying Zelaya out of the country, supposedly for refueling. The US admits that this took place, but denies having had any involvement or having known that Zelaya was on board. There is no proof that Americans were involved or that they did know. But there is still the question of why a plane would have to stop for refueling during a 40-minute flight. (Incidentally, back in July, Nikolas Kosloff pointed out that the Palmerola air base may itself have been one of the reasons for the coup.)

*This should be 20, not 21. The countries on the list are Argentina, Belize, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, the Dominican Republic, Uruguay, Paraguay and the United States, with Mexico and France observing.

UPDATE: According to Bloggings by Boz:

Honduras was among the countries invited “about a year ago” to participate in these exercises, which are planned well in advance. The plan for this year’s exercises also originally involved the use of Honduras’ Soto Cano air force base, where the US maintains a military presence. Following the coup, “about a month ago,” the US canceled the involvement of Soto Cano from the exercises. At that point, the Honduran military withdrew from the exercises due to the ongoing political differences between the de facto government and the other governments involved.

When weird tank-things drove down Chang’an Avenue

I originally planned to post this months ago, but other things got in the way and I forgot all about it.

It was just after 11 o’clock one night in April and there was nothing happening at work so I popped out to the shop. I was just starting to cross the road near the Millennium Monument when a policeman leaned out of his car and waved me back. For a moment I assumed this was because the traffic light was red, but then I looked behind him at the source of a deep, heavy roaring sound. Four huge things that appeared to be tanks were rumbling down Fuxing Road heading east towards Tiananmen Square!

Each of them was almost completely covered with a big blue wooden box carrying the name 河北重汽集团 (something like Hebei Heavy Vehicle Group), and at the bottom of each box was a fringe of gold tassles. But the tank treads were still clearly visible behind this disguise.

Much more interesting than my planned trip to the shop, so I jumped into a taxi to follow them.

“Where to?”
“Tiananmen Square.” It seemed like a better thing to say than “follow those tanks!”
“What do you want to see in Tiananmen Square at this time of night?”
“I haven’t got the slightest idea, to be honest, and I’m probably not even going there.” And then I told him what I’d just seen. He laughed.

“They’re not tanks. It’s something to do with fixing the road.”

This didn’t seem like a very likely story to me, but I couldn’t think of any better explanation. As we chatted about the big weird things ahead of us, it became clear that he was just as fascinated and bemused as I was. The tank-things had now disappeared from view because we’d got caught by traffic lights and I decided it was time to go back to work.

He dropped me off at Xidan, but almost immediately I heard that big rumbling sound again. Somehow we’d managed to get in front of them without overtaking. At the head of the convoy was the police car, then the “things,” followed by a truck painted with military camouflage, various emergency vehicles and more police cars.

When I got home, I checked the internet and discovered that other people were also wondering what the hell these tanks in boxes were for. Apparently they were making the same journey at the same time every night.

I went out again on the following night, with a camera this time and just as I stepped outside I heard the noise. Damn, I’d missed them. So, taxi time again. We were luckier with the traffic than the night before and I saw them turn south onto the 2nd Ring Road. Once again I got off at Xidan and, as I’d now guessed, the mysterious tank-things doubled back and rejoined Chang’an Avenue behind me. The result of this night’s outing was the abysmal video above. Apologies for the crappy picture - my camera simply can’t handle this sort of thing at night, but that’s no excuse for my failure to use it properly.

So, what were they and what were they doing? It turned out they were testing the strength of the roads and the subways below. Each night all the underpasses were closed off and fitted with seismic equipment to measure the vibrations. And all of this was in preparation for reinforcement work so that when the real tanks eventually roll down this route for the 60th anniversary parade on October 1, they don’t all fall down a great big hole.

Here are couple of pictures a reporter took of the mock tanks when they stopped over a subway. The report was quickly deleted, but there are plenty of copies around (eg. this one).

weird-tank-things.jpg

weird-tank-things-2.jpg

Now, of course the real things are out on the roads of Beijing. I passed a huge convoy of tanks, trucks loaded with missiles and other trucks carrying barrels (what would they be for?) at about three o’clock this morning as I was bringing one my cats back home from the vet.

When I grow up I want to be a corrupt official

On the first day of term, Southern Metropolis Daily asked primary school children in Guangzhou what they want to be when they grow up. Here are some of the answers:

01-dont-know.JPG
(After much head scratching) “I don’t know”

02-photographer.JPG
“A photographer”

03-painter.JPG
“A painter”

04-pilot.JPG
“A pilot”

05-fireman.JPG
“A fireman, because firemen can help people put out fires”

And then there was this girl:

06-corrupt-official.JPG
“I want to be an official”
“What kind of official?”
“A corrupt official, because corrupt officials have a lot of things.”

Postscript:
Since Southern Metropolis Daily posted the video, it’s generated a huge amount of interest and comment on the Chinese internet and, to a lesser extent, in English as well. For some strange reason, the paper decided to delete that page, but the video is available on Youtube.

So, what does it mean? Nothing really. It’s funny and that’s it.

None of us have any idea what this particular six-year-old thinks “a corrupt official” is. Her mother reportedly explained it to her, but we don’t know what that explanation was or how much of it she understood. Neither do we know what the girl was thinking when she gave her answer. Without knowing these things, we are simply transferring our own adult views onto a child.

I prefer to think that she was joking and was quite pleased with herself for saying something so unexpected. But this is just another opinion, like everyone else’s, with no evidence whatsoever to back it up.

Nothing to do with genitals

I haven’t got the slightest idea if Rem Koolhaas was or wasn’t thinking of genitalia when he designed the new CCTV building.

content.JPG

cctv-building.jpg

Likewise, no one has ever proved that church doors were built with the same thing in mind.

church-door.jpg

And I certainly wouldn’t dream of suggesting anything about the Monument to the People’s Heroes in the middle of Tiananmen Square.

monument-to-the-peoples-heroes.jpg

ProState in Flames attacker jailed for four and a half years

xu-lai.jpg
Xu Lai just before the attack on Feb. 14

This news is now three weeks old, but I only just noticed it and no one else seems to have mentioned it in English. The man who stabbed the blogger ProState in Flames (journalist and writer Xu Lai) at a book signing on Valentines Day was sentenced to four and a half years in prison early this month.

The attacker, Yang Chun, was arrested in Suzhou less than a week after the stabbing and a court in Beijing accepted the case in June. (See Danwei.) The prosecution alleged that Yang Chun had carried out the attack because he believed Xu Lai had damaged his friend’s reputation.

Yang had previously been in prison for embezzlement. He was also reportedly kidnapped last year.

A Southern Metropolis Daily report on August 7 confirmed internet speculation that Yang Chun’s “friend” was Peking University professor Kong Qingdong (Yang was Kong’s assistant) and that Yang was angry about one particular blog post:

Chairman Mao’s old warrior Kong Qingdong taken away for suspected involvement in North Korean spy case.

According to informed sources at Peking University, plainclothes police officers from the State Security Bureau came around 7pm to the university security office and asked to see Professor Kong Qingdong. They informed Kong that he was suspected of providing information to North Korea through his Beijing University Sovereign Thoughts Study Group and took him away for interrogation.

(See cat898 in Chinese and ESWN in English)

The rumor caused a bit of a stir, but it was quickly dispelled and that surely should have been the end of it. Instead, for some peculiar reason, Yang Chun landed himself back in prison for an utterly pointless attack. He also had to pay 70,000 yuan in compensation for Xu Lai’s hospital bill and lost earnings.

One of the things that puzzles me is that reports back in February referred to two attackers, not one. Maybe this is because eyewitnesses were confused. I don’t know.

Xu Lai still hasn’t started blogging again.

xu-lai-2.jpg
Xu Lai after the attack

Rape and beatings in a Beijing “black jail” hotel

juyuan-hotel.JPG
Entrance to the Juyuan Hotel on Majiabao Road, Beijing

Last week’s edition of Southern Weekly (Aug. 6) carried an extraordinarily rare article on a subject that is usually off-limits for the mainstream media in China: the “black jails” that operate outside of the law in Beijing, detaining people who have committed no crime and have simply come to the capital to exercise their legal right to petition the central government. The report avoids the term “black jail” and does not discuss the widespread use of these illegal places of detention. Nevertheless, it gives a graphic account of life inside one of them.

The spark for this article was the rape of a girl from Anhui province in the middle of the night, six hours after she arrived, by one of the thugs employed by a Henan local official to guard the petitioners in storeroom in the Juyuan Hotel near Beijing South Station. (Continued)

How did a protest become mass murder?

ABC News:

We arrived at one of Urumqi’s biggest mosques with about 80 journalists in a convoy of about six or seven mini-vans.

Almost every journalist still left in Urumqi was there, because there was almost no violence on the streets. There’s very little else left to cover.

NO, NO, NO! There’s a huge amount left to cover. Here’s one crucial thing that we still know almost nothing about and we will never know if journalists don’t start doing some serious digging. What exactly happened on Sunday evening? How did an initially peaceful protest by Uygur students turn into the mass murder of more than a hundred innocent Han civilians? So far, we have almost no information on this at all. Two of the most detailed accounts are by Yazhou Zhoukan and The Economist. But they don’t even come close to being enough.

ESWN’s translation (scroll down 3/4 of the page) of Yazhou Zhoukan’s account of the earlier events:

The locals recalled that the young Uighur women of Urumqi began to wear scarves on the afternoon of July 5. According to local custom, this means that something big was about to happen. At around 6:20pm that evening, more than 200 persons gathered at People’s Plaza. They were persuaded to leave. This group included many Uighur students. Eyewitnesses said that the proceedings was controlled by certain Uighurs persons who clashed frequently with the Hans. The police was only interested in clearing the streets and they did not interfere with the march.

More than seventy troublemakers were taken away by the police and the rest dispersed. Those Uighurs who were chased away re-grouped in Erdaoqiao at Liberation Road South and Shanxi Lane. They chanted slogans and caused chaos at the scene. At the university with the most number of Uighurs — Xinjiang University — the Uighur students chanted slogans, assembled in the canteen and charged into the streets. Amidst the chaos, the rioters set two cars on fire in front of the Xinjiang University entrance. By 7:30pm, more than one thousand Uighurs gathered in front of the Women and Children Health Care Hospital on Shanxi Lane; at 7:40pm, more than 300 people blocked the road at People Road and South Gate.

The Economist:

The Uighur side of the story has been slower to emerge. Many Uighurs dismissed the government’s account that the July 5th riot was part of a separatist plot. But very few—such was the terror of police or Han recrimination—were willing to say much. One Uighur owner of a clothes shop, who claimed to have witnessed the riot from the beginning, said it started as a demonstration calling on Xinjiang’s governor to come out and talk about what had happened in Guangdong. In the fracas there on June 25th, Han Chinese workers had accused Uighurs of rape. At least two Uighurs were killed in the fight.

After about 90 minutes the police told Urumqi’s protesters to leave, said the man from the clothes shop. The police then began shoving and pulling demonstrators who refused to go. When some Uighurs responded by smashing windows, the police used greater force, beating people and firing their weapons. Violence by Uighurs then began to flare across the city.

Is this all we are able to learn? We need way more information than this if we are to make any kind of rational, informed assessment of that day.

Yazhou Zhoukan’s statement: “At around 6:20pm that evening, more than 200 persons gathered at People’s Plaza. They were persuaded to leave.” What does this mean? How were they “persuaded”?

“More than seventy troublemakers were taken away by the police and the rest dispersed.” What were the “troublemakers” doing and how were the rest “dispersed”?

I know it is not easy to get good information, but we need far more direct eyewitness accounts - and not hearsay and rumors. Eyewitnesses are not always reliable. When Jean Charles de Menezes was shot dead by British police on the London Underground, every single detail reported in the media from eyewitnesses was false. But that was a sudden event that was over within minutes, taking everyone completely by surprise. The conflict in Urumqi evolved over a number of hours. Maybe too many people are afraid to talk about it. Maybe too many people who could say more have been arrested as suspects. And maybe many of them have now left the city. But some greater attempt needs to be made to build up a bigger picture and the chronology of events deserves to be the main focus of articles, not just a snippet.

We cannot get the full story from the Chinese media, because they will not report anything that might possibly contradict the government’s story. And we cannot get anything reliable from exile organizations who repeat grossly exaggerated and distorted rumors.

Investigating the events of July 5 will take time and a great deal of effort. But it would be better to take that time and risk having no report at all than simply repeating the same sketchy details that everyone else is writing.