Skip to content

Patriots unite! Renounce your Canadian citizenship!

return-to-the-motherland.jpg It is a well-known fact that Canadians are evil. However, as the great Bill O’Reilly pointed out, they are just as vulnerable as the French. But is boycotting their products enough? And what if you’re a patriot who has the misfortune to actually be Canadian?

I am most gratified to learn that there is now a campaign urging patriots to renounce their Canadian citizenship. I wasn’t aware until today that the Canadian prime minister is a space telescope. And I hadn’t realized that Queen Elizabeth was quite so old. But I know these things now and I wholeheartedly support this campaign:

The Canadian government led by Hubble, using human rights as a pretext, consistently adopts policies that are hostile to China. He has met the Dalai Lama, supported Tibetan independence and now refuses to attend the Olympic Games opening ceremony that symbolizes world peace. The Canadian mainstream media, represented by CBC, and public opinion have taken the opportunity of the Olympic torch relay to shamelessly slander our beloved motherland, the People’s Republic of China. As descendants of Yandi and the Yellow Emperor, we absolutely cannot tolerate this anymore.

We hereby solemnly proclaim the establishment of the “Return to the Motherland Action Committee.” We appeal to everyone to unite, and collectively renounce our Canadian citizenship or permanent residency and solemnly revoke our naturalization pledge to show our contempt and strong protest against the Canadian government!

Canada is a member of the British Commonwealth. When you were naturalized, you pledged wholehearted loyalty to the British Queen and royal heirs. Standing beneath the maple leaf flag and facing the Lord Chancellor, you pledged: “I swear (or affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors.”

The British Queen is the chief representative of Western colonialism. She brazenly launched the two Opium Wars against the Chinese nation, cut up our land, destroyed our homeland and humiliated our great nation in every possible way. As a true patriot, you must revoke your pledge by renouncing your Canadian citizenship, otherwise you are a disloyal descendant of the Chinese nation. Perhaps you have never taken this pledge seriously, or really did not know what you had said. If that is the case, your words are like worthless rubbish and you have no business shouting till you are blue in the face that you love China.

Back to Our Motherland was registered by someone going by the name of Peter Lee of Toronto on April 17. However, it was a Peter Wu who apparently contacted the Canadian-Chinese website info.51.ca to publicize his cause. Mr. Wu (or Mr. Lee) said he was from Hebei and had been in Canada for ten years. He wanted to tell the April 13 demonstrators that he supported them, but only if they adopted his proposal. April 13 organizers appear to have welcomed his patriotic zeal, but did not think this was a particularly practical idea.

Mr. Wu/Lee’s clarion call elicited a somewhat mixed response on the Montreal-based website Sino-Quebec. One netizen was worried about the paperwork and procedures, but otherwise thoroughly supported the idea. Another called Mr. Wu a “stupid [censored]” and quoted Jiang Zemin’s famous rebuke to the Hong Kong media: “too simple, sometimes naive.” Others suspected a conspiracy, possibly by Tibetan separatists or Canadian intelligence. Or maybe Mr. Wu/Lee just wanted to avoid paying his taxes.

So is this campaign real? No one seems to know. But when the line between reality, parody and possible sabotage becomes so blurred, it might be a sign that things are going just a little bit too far.

See also: Mutant Palm, Blood and Treasure, Amoist, Lian Yue and Hecaitou.

No more heroes

The constitution of the Communist Party of China used to include the words: “Despite twists and turns, and relapses in the course of development, the inevitable replacement of capitalism by socialism is an irreversible general trend in the history of social development.”

Here are a few of those twists and turns in pictorial pairs. (Copied from here. Thanks to Sun Bin for the recommendation) The original poster said no explanation was necessary, but perhaps for an English-language readership, some words might be helpful.

Lin Biao Good:

linbiao1.jpg


“Completely establish the absolute authority of Mao Zedong Thought”

Lin Biao, expected to one day succeed Mao Zedong as chairman of the party, holds a book of the “Three Constantly Read Articles” containing Mao’s speeches “Serve the People,” “In Memory of Norman Bethune,” and “The Foolish Old Man Removed the Mountains.”

Lin Biao Bad:

linbiao2.jpg
“Fiercely criticize modern China’s Confucius - Lin Biao.”
(The slogan in the woman’s hand says “‘Restrain oneself and restore the rites’ means restoring the old order.”)

During the byzantine power struggles of Mao’s final years, the long-lasting Criticize Lin Biao, Criticize Confucius campaign reached its peak nationwide in 1974, despite the fact that Lin Biao had died in September 1971 - allegedly in a plane crash in Mongolia as he allegedly tried to flee after allegedly failing in a bizarre plot to allegedly assassinate Chairman Mao. Many people were criticized in the course of this campaign including, at one point, Zhou Enlai. Ironically, some teachers managed to use the campaign as an excuse to reintroduce lessons in the classics.

Liu Shaoqi Good:

liushaoqi1.jpg

President Liu Shaoqi occupies almost equal pride of place with Mao on the front page of the 1965 National Day edition of the Beijing Daily.

Liu Shaoqi Bad:

liushaoqi2.jpg
“Completely smash the Liu-Deng reactionary line!”

Jiang Qing (Mao’s wife) Good:

jiangqing1.jpg
“Learn from Comrade Jiang Qing
Salute Comrade Jiang Qing!”

Jiang Qing (Mao’s widow) Bad:

jiangqing2.jpg
“Resolutely overthrow the Wang-Zhang-Jiang-Yao anti-party clique!”
(The Gang of Four - Wang Hongwen, Zhang Chunqiao, Jiang Qing and Yao Wenyuan)

Soviet Union Good:

“The Great Friendship Picture Exhibition
Organized by the Tianjin Sino-Soviet Friendship Association”
sovietexperts.jpg
“Study the Soviet Union’s vanguard experience in production.
Strive to industrialize our motherland.”

Soviet Union Bad:

sovietrevisionists.jpg
“Workers of the world unite!
Smash the US imperialists! Smash the Soviet revisionists!”

dinnerwiththeimperialist.jpg

Premier Zhou Enlai serves dinner to the imperialist president, accompanied by Zhang Chunqiao.

La double vie de Xinhua

duran.jpg

Xinhua:

PARIS, 22 avril (Xinhua) — Les appels au boycott des jeux Olympiques de Beijing sont déplacés et il faut tout faire pour que les JO soient une grande fête, a indiqué le PDG du distributeur français Carrefour José-Luis Duran, lors d’une interview exclusive accordée à l’agence Xinhua.

Xinhua:

PARIS, April 22 (Xinhua) — The chairman of French supermarket chain Carrefour said Tuesday that calls for boycott of Beijing Olympics were acts with ulterior motives, and Carrefour would make its utmost efforts to support the Olympics.

In an exclusive interview with Xinhua, Carrefour Chairman Jose Luis Duran also denied reports that his company supported Tibetan separatists.

Xinhua:

新华网巴黎4月22日电(记者郑甦春 李学梅)法国家乐福集团总裁迪朗22日在接受新华社记者专访时表示,抵制奥运会的呼吁是别有用心的行为,家乐福将尽全力支持北京奥运会。他同时否认了家乐福支持“藏独”势力的传闻。

Xinhua:

Interrogé sur les appels au boycott de Carrefour dans plusieurs villes chinoises, M. Duran a fait part de sa compréhension vis-à- vis de l’émotion du peuple chinois. “Il est évident que les nombreux incidents qui ont perturbé le parcours de la flamme olympique lors de son passage à Paris le 7 avril en sont à l’ origine tant ils ont choqué et même blessé l’opinion chinoise”, a- t-il indiqué, tout en souhaitant que “le calme revienne et que la fin de la préparation des JO se fasse dans un climat serein, car c’ est l’intérêt de tous que les Jeux organisés par Beijing soient un succès”.

Xinhua:

Referring to calls for boycotting Carrefour in some cities across China, Duran expressed his understanding for the Chinese people’s emotion, saying that “Obviously, recent sabotage incidents in Paris during the Olympic torch relay hurt feelings ofthe Chinese people, made them angry and triggered their protests.”

“I hope that the preparations for the Olympics will be implemented with a harmonious atmosphere. The success of the Beijing Olympics will benefit all the people,” he added.

Xinhua:

对于目前中国一些城市发起的抵制家乐福的呼吁,迪朗表示理解中国人民此时此刻的感情。他说:“很明显,4月7日奥运圣火经过巴黎时所发生的多起破坏事件是事情的起因,这令中国人民感到震怒,并伤害了中国人民的感情。我希望人们现在能够平静下来,让奥运会最后的准备工作能在祥和的气氛中进行。因为北京奥运会的成功举办是有利于所有人的。”

duran-duran.jpg

Will foreign students be kicked out of Beijing?

“Ha! Your Western media’s up to its tricks again!” said my political editor with a mixture of mockery and satisfaction, laying particular stress on those two words “Western media.”

“What’s the story?” I asked.

“According your Western media, all foreign students are going to have to get out of Beijing in the summer. According to the Western media, that is.”

“Hang on a minute. Which ‘Western media’?”

“All of it. So you’ll have to pack your bags. According to the Western media.”

Three things: One, I’m not a student, so even if this story were true I wouldn’t have to leave. Two, I get on very well with this editor and he was just baiting me. And three, although I put that conversation in quotation marks I did not record it so I have no real certainty that those were our exact words.

But what is the story? And is it true or is it a repeat of the non-existent Bible ban?

EPA quotes Deutsche Presse-Agentur:

China plans to order all foreign students to leave the country before the Olympic Games in August, strictly regulate the issuing of business and tourist visas, and deport refugees, sources said on Thursday.

‘Even if you have to continue your studies in September, you need to leave Beijing in July and August,’ a spokeswoman for Beijing University told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa.

The spokeswoman said the two-month gap applies to all universities in Beijing and was ordered by ‘higher authorities’ because of the Olympics.

Shanghaiist is somewhat skeptical and suspects that foreign students’ problems might be limited to tighter visa restrictions.

Xinhua is adamant:

Overseas media reports that foreign students in China would have to leave the country during the August Olympic Games were “totally fabricated”, the Ministry of Education said here Friday.

“Recently, some foreign media say China requires foreign students to leave during the Games. It completely goes against the facts,” ministry spokesman Wang Xuming said.

Relevant departments and universities “have never asked foreign students to leave China during the Olympics and Paralympics. During that time, foreign students could stay and some of them would join volunteer services”.

He added international cooperation and exchanges in the educational field would proceed as usual, including accepting foreign students who would come to study in China.

So who do you believe? The Ministry of Education or Deutsche Presse-Agentur? The Global Times concluded that this was another deliberate German attack on the Beijing Olympics. Slightly exaggerated, perhaps. But the Global Times did do the obvious thing - ask Peking University:

“It’s a very strange thing. We didn’t know we were going to do this ourselves until we read the report!” When the Global Times interviewed a member of staff at the overseas students office at Peking University, the worker was clearly astonished, telling the reporter: “Peking University’s summer program for overseas students will go ahead as planned. It hasn’t been canceled at all. And the Peking University spokeswoman mentioned in the report simply doesn’t exist. We’ve only got one spokesperson and he’s a man.”

So, it would seem that the story is probably not true - at least as far as summer students are concerned. But everyone seems to agree that visa rules are being enforced with greater vigor. Anyway, we won’t have to wait long to be sure. Either foreign students will be enrolled in summer courses or they won’t. Meanwhile, I think I should say that most of the “Western media” appears to be treating the report with caution. Blame those perfidious Germans, not me. (Note to Germans: I’m joking.)

Whoops!

journey-of-harmony.jpg

journey-of-harm.JPG

China’s influence

With all the Tibet furore, I missed the release of the BBC World Service poll (PDF) measuring views on the positive and negative influence of various countries around the world. The BBC leads with the United States. Not surprisingly, I’m more interested in China. But Americans might be disturbed to know that the world thinks China has a more positive influence than their country. Or at least it did before Tibetans started killing Han and Hui, and Nepali police started beating Tibetans. (No wonder Stephen Hadley’s confused, though the Huffington Post shouldn’t get too cocky about Hadley’s mistake - it’s been prominently featuring mislabeled pictures of Nepali police violence.)

Here are the results for just two of the countries involved - China and the US: (Continued)

“Are you really Tibetan? You’re so clean!”

Here’s a translation from two posts on Lian Yue’s blog. They’re emails sent to him by readers. The first is in two parts - this is the young Tibetan woman that drunkpiano referred to in his post “The Enemy of My Enemy” (English translation here). The second is from a government official.

In the first, Lian Yue apologizes to readers for deleting some sections and omitting several names.

Dear Lian Yue,

I really hope you will allow me to say a little on your blog about my own situation.

I’m a Tibetan who cannot speak the Tibetan language. I can understand a little of the Lhasa dialect and I can understand the Gannan dialect, but I cannot speak it.

Right now, I don’t know any more than everyone else about the real situation… (section deleted)

I’ll say a little about my personal experiences.

When I went to primary school in Lhasa, there were schools that offered classes in Tibetan but the quality of teaching was very poor and not many pupils went on to higher grades. Parents would usually choose schools with a higher graduation rate so when I left kindergarten I didn’t take Tibetan classes and I completely forgot how to read or write Tibetan.

Before I finished primary school, I moved out of Tibet for health reasons and had even less contact with the language.

After I graduated, I applied for an office job. One boss asked my to change my Tibetan name to something that Han people could recognize more easily, like Zhuoma or Zhuoga, to give people a strong impression and be more competitive in business.

Later I went to XX for an interview. One manager was extremely interested in knowing whether or not Tibetans only wash twice in their lives. He was very curious to know: “Don’t they mind being dirty?” That took up a third of the interview.

Later on, my parent’s friend introduced me to a boyfriend who was Han. His mother was only worried about one thing: “She’s Tibetan. Supposing there’s a court case - my son would definitely lose.”

A few years ago, my father passed away. My relatives came a huge distance all the way from Gannan and got out butter lamps ready to light. The local committee [组织上] said: “This is the XXX memorial hall. We can’t have that kind of feudal superstition here.” In the end I just had to throw away all the offerings and candles the committee had prepared to resolve the problem.

Also at that time, my sister had to keep it a secret that she went to the Jokhang Temple. If her work unit found out, they would have docked her salary.

A few years ago, I took my father’s ashes to Labrang Monastery where he lived when he was a child. The patriarch of the family braved wind and snow to recover solid remains from the ashes and we stood round him crying. But that didn’t stop a novelty-seeking Han from snapping and flashing away with his camera. In the end I cursed him in Han to chase him off.

People in the county town where I come from don’t wear Tibetan clothes to work anymore because it makes them feel inferior and ashamed in front of their Han colleagues.

In the past, my relatives back home could cut wood and sell it to earn money to buy things they needed. Then, because so many Han went there to cut down trees, the state banned tree cutting. With nothing to live on, they had to go to the city to find work. But with no education, their status was lower than Han migrant workers and they didn’t get the same pay for the same work.

My neighbors often praise us sincerely: “Are you really Tibetan? Hey, you don’t look it. You’re so white and so clean….”

In this city that’s called a center of culture, even my mother, my own family, everyone is trying as hard as they can to avoid revealing their Tibetan identity because we can’t fight off the nasty things people say.

Later, I made up my mind to study Tibetan, but I didn’t realize how hard that would turn out to be. I searched all over Lhasa and Beijing and I sill haven’t found any recorded teaching materials.

Now my Han friends say: “What a pity. You’ve lost your culture.”

The things a lot of people do and say hurt us, even though they don’t mean to. It seems that time and again we’ve tried to ignore this kind of hurt. But, now (sentence deleted). I hope from now on people won’t indulge in this kind of thing.

——————————–

I never thought that in the space of one night everyone would discuss my letter so enthusiastically. In most of the comments, people seriously examined their own thoughts and actions and that really moved me, so I’d like to add the following.

First, thank you to everyone for their care and sympathy. Obviously, I’m quite embarrassed to be looked at so closely. Actually, in all the examples I listed, none of these experiences made me feel inferior. I really am the way some people suggested, living up to the common Tibetan tradition of patience. I listed these things as an attempt to find what the disputes probably are. But the fact that I don’t feel inferior doesn’t mean that others feel the same way.

Secondly, the one thing I do mind, and does make me feel inferior, has nothing to do with Han people. It’s that I can’t speak my own language. It limits the contact I have with my own people, to the point where I’m afraid to deal with compatriots who only speak Tibetan, so learning Tibetan has been my biggest desire since I grew up. It’s because I want to be able to freely and confidently mix with my own people and because I want to do my utmost to understand my own ethnic group.

Finally, there isn’t really any need to give a serious rebuttal to anything, but my sensitivity and sense of inferiority demands that I counter one thing:

“… The question is, does this girl really understand her own people? Does she really love them?”

I don’t think I need to show anyone any proof of my love for my own people.

That post was followed by this one:

Dear Lian Yue,

This morning I read the letter you posted from a Tibetan girl. Just last night I was discussing the Tibet issue and the Dalai Lama’s statement with another government official, criticizing the government restrictions on media reporting and some of the illogical and obviously mindless conclusions. He suddenly asked me: “We’re so good to minorities. When do we discriminate against them?!” I said: “Why is it that so many people, as soon as minorities are mentioned, the first thing they think of is that minorities are backward, ignorant, dirty and uncivilized? They’re like everyone else, an equal group. They all have the right to have their own way of life. They’ve got different customs and a different culture. Why would we have this impression?! Isn’t that discrimination?!”

I felt I didn’t express myself very well and was wondering how to persuade him, Then this morning I saw your blog. I sent the article to him and sent him an SMS. In my email I said: “It isn’t discrimination that’s dreadful. What’s dreadful is not knowing that this is discrimination!”

A government official.

Separatism and Tibet

I’ve been waiting for the article below to be published before reproducing it here with permission from the writer Barry Sautman, Associate Professor of social science at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. A slightly shorter version appeared in Monday’s edition of the Straits Times.

Protests in Tibet and Separatism: the Olympics and Beyond
Barry Sautman

Recent protests in Lhasa and other Tibetan areas were organized to embarrass the Chinese government ahead of the Olympics. The Tibetan Youth Congress (TYC), the major Tibetan exile organization that advocates independence for Tibet and has endorsed using violent methods to achieve it, has said as much. Its head, Tsewang Rigzin, stated in a March 15 interview with the Chicago Tribune that since it is likely that Chinese authorities would suppress protests in Tibet, “With the spotlight on them with the Olympics, we want to test them. We want them to show their true colors. That’s why we’re pushing this.” At the June, 2007 Conference for an Independent Tibet organized in India by “Friends of Tibet,” speakers pointed out that the Olympics present a unique opportunity for protests in Tibet. In January, 2008, exiles in India launched a “Tibetan People’s Uprising Movement” to “act in the spirit” of the violent 1959 uprising against Chinese government authority and focus on the Olympics.

Several groups of Tibetans were likely involved in the protests in Lhasa, including in the burning and looting of non-Tibetan businesses and attacks against Han and Hui (Muslim Chinese) migrants to Tibet. The large monasteries have long been centers of separatism, a stance cultivated by the TYC and other exile entities, many of which are financed by the US State Department or the US Congress’ National Endowment for Democracy. Monks are self-selected to be especially devoted to the Dalai Lama. However much he may characterize his own position as seeking only greater autonomy for Tibet, monks know he is unwilling to declare that Tibet is an inalienable part of China, an act China demands of him as a precondition to formal negotiations. Because the exile regime eschews a separation of politics and religion, many monks deem adherence to the Dalai Lama’s stance of non-recognition of the Chinese government’s legitimacy in Tibet to be a religious obligation.

Reports on the violence have underscored that Tibetan merchants competing with Han and Hui are especially antagonistic to the presence of non-Tibetans. Alongside monks, Tibetan merchants were the mainstay of protests in Lhasa in the late 1980s and early 1990s. This time around, many Han and Hui-owned shops were torched. Many of those involved in arson, looting, and ethnic-based beatings are also likely to have been unemployed young men. Towns have experienced much rural-to-urban migration of Tibetans with few skills needed for urban employment. Videos from Lhasa showed the vast majority of rioters were males in their teens or twenties.

The recent actions in Tibetan areas differ from the broad-based demonstrations of “people power” movements in several parts of the world in the last few decades. They hardly show the overwhelming Tibetan anti-Chinese consensus portrayed in the international media. The highest media estimate of Tibetans who participated in protests is 20,000 — by Steve Chao, the Beijing Bureau Chief of Canadian Television News, i.e. one of every 300 Tibetans. Compare that to the 1986 protests against the Marcos dictatorship by about three million — one out of every 19 Filipinos.

Tibetans have legitimate grievances about not being sufficiently helped to compete for jobs and in business with migrants to Tibet. There is also job discrimination by Han migrants in favor of family members and people from their native places. The gaps in education and living standards between Tibetans and Han are substantial and too slow in narrowing. The grievances have long existed, but protests and rioting took place this year because the Olympics make it opportune for separatists to advance their agenda. Indeed, there was a radical disconnect between Tibetan socio-economic grievances and the slogans raised in the protests, such as “Complete Independence for Tibet” and “May the exiles and Tibetans inside Tibet be reunited,” slogans that not coincidentally replicate those raised by pro-independence Tibetan exiles. (Continued)

When in Rome

What on earth are we to make of this picture:

lamas.jpg

Are they taking robes as presents for the monks as a goodwill gesture? Was the photograph actually taken this year?

[UPDATE] As Chiara points out in the comments below, Wang Xiaoshan has now deleted the post I linked to and issued an apology. A commenter at Time Magazine’s China Blog says:

这是武警为电影做群众演员,在中国经常会有投资较大需要人来扮演古代军队等大规模群体时,请武警甚至是军人来当演员。因为他们训练有素,比普通人强悍。这是个很可笑的现象,但是这在中国挺常见。

(These are armed police acting as extras for a crowd scene. Big budget movies needing large crowds, such as soldiers in an ancient army, often ask armed police or soldiers to act. That’s because they are well trained and braver than ordinary people. This is a ridiculous phenomenon, but it often happens.)

That would make Gemini’s joke about costumes for a play quite relevant. The photograph appears to have been used for the back cover of the TCHRD 2003 Annual Report, which would make it at least five years old. A number of websites (eg. this one) are posting it along with an article from the Canada Free Press by Gordon Thomas - a writer whose startling exclusives have included the ‘revelation’ (as in hallucinatory dream) that Osama bin Laden was in China, keeping the peace in Xinjiang. Hmm, not sure I buy that one.

So, once again a picture tells a thousand words. But which words and what do they mean? That depends on what you want to believe.

Wang Lixiong: Reflections on Tibet

New Left Review published a very long and very interesting article in 2002 by Wang Lixiong. Here’s the first paragraph:

In the current debate on Tibet the two opposing sides see almost everything in black and white—differing only as to which is which. But there is one issue that both Chinese authorities and Tibetan nationalists consistently strive to blur or, better still, avoid altogether. At the height of the Cultural Revolution hundreds of thousands of Tibetans turned upon the temples they had treasured for centuries and tore them to pieces, rejected their religion and became zealous followers of the Great Han occupier, Mao Zedong. To the Chinese Communist Party, the episode is part of a social catastrophe—one that it initiated but has long since disowned and which, it hopes, the rest of the world will soon forget. For the Tibetan participants, the memory of that onslaught is a bitter humiliation, one they would rather not talk about, or which they try to exorcise with the excuse that they only did it ‘under pressure from the Han’. Foreign critics simply refuse to accept that the episode ever took place, unable to imagine that the Tibetans could willingly and consciously have done such a thing. But careful analysis and a deeper reflection on what was involved in that trauma may shed light on some of the cultural questions at stake on the troubled High Plateau.

It’s well worth reading the rest (good proxy needed in China). The 1998 Chinese article is posted at the Tianya Forum among other places.

There’s a bit of an irony in this: the English version, which few Chinese people would choose to read, is currently blocked by keyword, while the Chinese-language version is freely accessible.

See also: Tsering Shakya’s rebuttal.